A few weeks ago, I sat in on a Jay Wiseman class at TES.
He opened the class by saying something to the effect of:
I am a kinskster. I like to tie women up. And that’s ok. The vanilla world, they need to be tolerant of us. After all, haven’t we spent enough time being tolerant of them?
Those last two sentences bothered the hell out of me.
Now, I mean no offense to Jay Wiseman, nor do I want to belittle his accomplishments as an author and community member. And I agree that it’s important to be comfortable in one’s own skin. But the implicit “us verses them” mentality wrapped up in those two little sentences is one of the major issues I have with many people in the scene.
First of all, by taking this stance, a person automatically goes on the defensive. He’s expecting confrontation and controversy… it leaves barely any room for the possibility that people may be accepting of that stance.
I can’t help but be reminded of one of my favorite Little Britain characters, Daffyd Thomas, the only gay in the village. He goes around declaring his otherness and creating his own persecution, even though it seems that the rest of the village is bi-curious at the very least.
As I wrote in a previous post, it’s natural to want to feel different or special. I know that I’ve been guilty of using kink as a way to establish my otherness, to create a separation between me and the “vanilla” world.
Then I realized… You can’t always tell what people do in their bedrooms.
Not everyone advertises their sexuality. Hell, when I was in college, I did things that could be defined as kinky, but it never occurred to me to attach any label or identity to them. Quite frankly, there are times and places where I’m perfectly happy with kink being off the list of appropriate conversation topics. (Around the watercooler at most jobs, family reunions, funerals, children’s parties…) BDSM, when you get down to it, is about sex… And what I do in my bedroom is my own damn business. I realize the irony of this statement coming from a sex blogger. I guess a more appropriate statement in my case is: if you have issues with what I do in my bedroom, don’t have sex with me.
To be honest, I’m a little torn on the debate about bringing kink into the public square. On the one hand, I hope that there will come a time when a person’s sexual proclivities cannot be used as a strike against them in a court of law. Also, people who are kinky should have access to reliable information so that they can practice it as safely as possible. On the other hand, engendering the idea that the rest of the world must tolerate us feels downright counterproductive. It borders dangerously on forcing one’s kink onto others.
I’m well aware that there are plenty of people in the world who are not accepting of things that they don’t understand. I’m also aware of the prejudices and preconceptions that people have when they hear “kinky” or “BDSM.” It has frightening connotations to many. I do hope that organizations such as TES and new initiatives such as Kinkforall can help dispel some of that misinformation.
Kink isn’t for everyone. It’s not without physical and emotional risk, even though there are ways of mitigating those risks. A lot of what we do is hard for people to accept. Upon reading my blog, someone once asked me What compels you to want pain? I know this may sound stupid, but my lord isn’t it painful?
People have visceral reactions to the thought of inflicting or receiving pain. It’s completely understandable why someone would squick at the thought.
I usually wait for people to get to know me as a person before I get into any conversation about BDSM. It is, after all, only one aspect of my life, not my entire being. This way, I change peoples minds through example and not through proselytizing. I find this to be a far more elegant, subtle, and effective approach.
If we’re going to gain any ground in the arenas where it matters, I think that we need to think hard about how we perceive and engage people outside of the kink community.

Recent Comments